Member-only story

How Architectural Utility Is Constrained By Politics And Damaged By Expression

Fernando Bell

·14.2k Followers· Follow

Published in Building Bad: How Architectural Utility Is Constrained By Politics And Damaged By Expression

3 min read · 1 month before

152 View Claps

35 Respond

Save

Listen

Architecture, as a field, is a complex and multifaceted one, with a wide range of factors influencing the design and construction of buildings. Two of the most significant factors that can impact architectural utility are politics and expression. In this article, we will explore how politics and expression can constrain and damage architectural utility.

Building Bad: How Architectural Utility is Constrained by Politics and Damaged by Expression

by Jonathan Ochshorn

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	3464 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Print length	:	241 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

Politics and Architectural Utility

Politics can play a significant role in shaping the design and construction of buildings. For example, government regulations and building codes can impact the size, shape, and appearance of buildings. In some cases, these regulations can be so restrictive that they can make it difficult to design buildings that are both functional and aesthetically pleasing.

In addition, political ideology can also impact architectural utility. For example, a government that is focused on promoting economic growth may be more likely to approve the construction of large-scale commercial developments, even if these developments have a negative impact on the surrounding environment.

Expression and Architectural Utility

Expression is another important factor that can impact architectural utility. Architects often use buildings as a way to express their creativity and individuality. However, this can sometimes lead to designs that are more focused on aesthetics than function.

In some cases, expressive design elements can actually make buildings less useful. For example, a building with an unusual shape may be more difficult to navigate, or a building with a lot of glass may be more difficult to heat and cool.

Politics and expression can both have a significant impact on architectural utility. It is important for architects to be aware of the potential constraints and damage that these factors can cause. By understanding these factors, architects can make better decisions about how to design and construct buildings that are both functional and aesthetically pleasing.

Building Bad: How Architectural Utility is Constrained by Politics and Damaged by Expression

by Jonathan Ochshorn

5 out of 5